| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Anyone in the Slays area looking for an easy war target? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
wardecs aren't free and blowing up spaceships requires a time and effort investment. There is no such thing as free kills. Pony up some cash.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2017.01.27 15:14:43
|
2. High-sec gaym mechics - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
aldhura wrote: Maybe you should learn to read.. and then think about what you read before you post your answer. How does this suggestion change the size of the decking corp ? it makes them have to leave trade hubs. You cant play station games ...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.10.06 09:15:43
|
3. High-sec gaym mechics - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
aldhura wrote: It does need fixing. Something like a beacon that the war decking corp needs to put up in the corporations home system that can't be near a station, citadel or gate that the deckers need to defend to keep the war going will stop ...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.10.06 01:46:50
|
4. High-sec gaym mechics - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Andrea Cemenotar wrote: ah right incursions - totally forgot about it ^-^ For some odd reason highsec incursion runners seem to be some kind of sacred cow to CCP. It's surprising the amount of consideration has been given to them when it come...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.09.17 19:19:06
|
5. Why is ganking profitable? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mercenary work in general consists of outlandishly rich mercenaries being paid by peasants to brutalize other peasants. It's really quite funny.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.20 14:05:36
|
6. If I leave a alliance at war what happens? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
That means you can't rejoin the corp you left for a week or until the war ends. You can join any other corp, even other corps in the same alliance. It's to prevent some specific things.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.26 16:11:16
|
7. Battleships - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The only complaint I have about battleships is their speed, battlecruisers have the same problem. The fact you can't get them anywhere useful in a timely manner renders them almost completely useless in most situations. By the time a battleship ge...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.24 17:37:44
|
8. How to get into PvP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
It's difficult to express how much that particular individual stood out from basically anyone I've ever seen in EVE as an absolute dreg. Most people have some kind of standard that they adhere to and levels to which they won't stoop, but that guy ...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.15 16:34:48
|
9. How to get into PvP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
There was a pretty visible and massive rift between what the RVB general populace knew and cared about and what the "command" people were interested in. I'm sure the vast majority of the alliance had no involvement with the POCO empire beyond some...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.15 12:42:50
|
10. How to get into PvP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Except you did try, pretty much continuously until Rooney handed them over to Brave, who also tried with a tengu/eagle fleet, failed both times without killing anything and sustaining losses and gave up when it became apparent they couldn't actual...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.14 14:50:11
|
11. How to get into PvP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Both of their alliances together managed to fail, twice to defend the only valuable customs offices in the game from our 20 man highsec PVP alliance. They're about as bad as bad gets.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.14 06:31:08
|
12. How to get into PvP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Brave are horrible and their alliance/s are falling apart, nobody should join Brave.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.13 18:20:27
|
13. How to get into PvP - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
You get into PVP by shooting at people.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.12 02:59:10
|
14. Mutual Wars - can someone explain? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
SurrenderMonkey wrote: My guess would be that they want the aggressor to be "invested" for at least a week, normally I think that's what they were going for too, however there's a huge logical failure in that reasoning. If an aggressor wants ...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.10 15:40:28
|
15. Mutual Wars - can someone explain? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mutual wars presently are barely a thing. The only function they have is to allow the aggressor to maintain the war for free. The functionality of locking the aggressor into the war is removed entirely as onice the war is made mutual the aggressor...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.09 16:54:14
|
16. Mutual Wars - can someone explain? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
In fact the only time you can ever retract a war is when someone makes it mutual. Why is this the only time you can retract a war? Who knows.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.12.09 14:19:21
|
17. Why do off grid links exist? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Did the OP really just say that people with links are bullying him? That's pretty special.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.11.09 12:58:18
|
18. POCO bashing - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
We've given up trying to take them down unless they have timers that come out really close to downtime. As it currently stands most POCOs are straight up invulnerable.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.11.05 14:34:22
|
19. POCO bashing - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
You'll be amazed at the timers you get if you reinforce them again. It's just even more confusing!
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.11.03 23:38:13
|
20. POCO bashing - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
It's broken.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2015.11.03 21:31:52
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |